from :: Asahikawa Hokkaido

passer-by198

primetime pencil

2013/02/19


Posted

【G20】Christine Lagarde「Statement」「Press Briefing」

Statement by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde on G-20 Ministerial Meeting in Moscow
source : 2013.02.16 IMF (ボタンクリックで引用記事が開閉)
IMF
Ms. Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), issued the following statement today after the conclusion of the Group of 20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting in Moscow:

“I would like to thank the Russian authorities for hosting us, including President Vladimir Putin, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Bank of Russia Governor Sergey Ignatiev. They were instrumental in facilitating discussions among G-20 ministers and governors on the significant challenges facing the world economy, and helped everyone to continue deliberations over policy actions needed to strengthen the global economic recovery.

“As emphasized by the G-20, global growth is still weak, with unemployment remaining unacceptably high in many countries. The weak global performance derives from policy uncertainty, private deleveraging, continued fiscal drag, as well as insufficient progress on rebalancing global demand. Implementation of the financial reform agenda to build a more resilient financial system remains a priority. Credible medium-term fiscal plans also need to be in place to provide flexibility while growth is more fully restored.

“I welcome G-20 resolve to achieve a lasting reduction in global imbalances through joint actions to avoid persistent exchange rate misalignments, and the group’s commitment to refrain from competitive devaluation, to resist protectionism in all forms, and to keep markets open. It was heartening to see the G-20 reaffirmed its commitment to move more rapidly toward more market-determined exchange rate systems and exchange rate flexibility to reflect underlying fundamentals.

“We think that talk of currency wars is overblown. People did talk about their currency worries. The good news is that the G-20 responded with cooperation rather than conflict today.

“Lastly, I welcome G-20 support for completing the 2010 quota reform agreement, and I urge countries to quickly ratify the measures necessary to implement this important agreement. The G-20 continues to demonstrate its interest in global economic cooperation through the IMF. I know that the 188 member countries of the Fund are committed to reaching agreement on the 15th General Review of Quotas, including a new quota formula, by January 2014.

“Many of the key issues discussed today will be reviewed at the Fund’s International Monetary and Financial Committee´s spring meeting in April, and at the next G-20 ministerial meeting, which will take place at roughly the same time in Washington. Until then, it is crucial that all countries continue efforts to strengthen global recovery.”

Transcript of a Press Briefing
source : 2013.02.16 IMF (ボタンクリックで引用記事が開閉)
IMF
Transcript of a Press Briefing by Christine Lagarde, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund, at the Conclusion of the Group of 20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting

MS. LAGARDE: (In progress following remarks thanking the Russian authorities) …with unemployment outrageously high in many countries and clearly all policies should be aimed at restoring growth and creating jobs. There are key commitments of the G-20, including a commitment to establish fiscal plans. You will see that in paragraph 3 of the communique which I suppose you have received. And prominently, the G-20's adoption of exchange rate language that is common to all members and that is clearly a policy commitment on their part.

There has been a lot of talk about a currency war and we have not seen any such thing as a currency war. We have had currency worries, not a currency war. We have not seen confrontation, but dialogue, deliberation, discussions, and clearly this G-20 Moscow meeting has been extremely helpful and productive in that respect. I will clearly engage you to look at the paragraph in the communique that deals specifically with that issue of common language concerning exchange rates.

As far as IMF-specific items are concerned, we have been really heartened by the support extended by the G-20 for our institution, the IMF, including for the work that we have been doing under the integrated surveillance decision, under the spillover reports, and on the work that we will be developing going forward that deals with sovereign debt in general, looking at those sovereign debts from multiple perspectives. This is work that is underway and that we will continue doing and on which we will deliver in the course of 2013 for the G-20, as well as for our own institution.

Lastly, the IMF governance reform was extensively discussed by the G-20 members. These are only 20 out of the 188 members of the institution, but they have a significant voice given their size, and they have clearly showed signs of renewed commitment in view of the results that were developed by the Executive Board of the IMF late in January. We have goals and we have delivery targets that will take in parallel the quota review and the quota formula review, with hopeful delivery of results before the end of 2013, and with clear support from the G-20 and the G-20 Russian presidency, in particular.

With that I would welcome any questions that you have on any particular matter.

QUESTION: -- will you comment on your concern by fiscal imbalances in the United States or fiscal worries in the United States and Japan? How confident are you that they will be overcome?

MS. LAGARDE: There is a clear understanding on the part of both the U.S. authorities and the Japanese authorities present with us on the occasion of this meeting that the fiscal agenda is critical. What I mean by fiscal agenda is clearly the medium-term goals that have to be identified, that have to be supported broadly in those countries, and that need to be specific and detailed enough in order to eliminate as much as possible the uncertainty that goes with a lack of agenda, so that there is that political determination of the authorities.

QUESTION: There is also a very divided U.S. political scene at the moment going back into another self-inflicted division. Are you confident that the problem can be overcome as the Obama administration eases itself into a second term?

MS. LAGARDE: There will be debates about sequestration, there will be debate about the long-term fiscal plans of the U.S. authorities, and our position has always been the same. We need to have the anchoring of a medium-term fiscal consolidation plan on the part of the U.S. economy. What we also acknowledge is that there has been quite a lot of fiscal consolidation over the last few years, and as scheduled without sequestration there will be fiscal consolidation which is desirable, not in excess but desirable.

QUESTION: One last question. Where is the happy medium for you then in terms of austerity versus any further stimulus? Because -- quite critical of some of the austerity measures taken in some parts of say Europe for example.

MS. LAGARDE: There has to be fiscal consolidation and it has to be at the right pace and it has to be country specific. It often has to go hand in hand with monetary policy and we have seen quite accommodative monetary policy in order to actually support and help the fiscal consolidation efforts. They cannot be a substitute for each other. They have to go in parallel and that's what we certainly hope to see with the missing element, if I might say, which is this medium-term anchoring that is needed in those countries.

QUESTION: -- in the past you've called for even a more accommodative policy in Europe. Are you still of that view considering that the data we've recently seen that the Euro Zone is still mired in recession? And on IMF governance reform, are you in a sense frustrated if you get support but then when it comes to negotiating you don't actually see a whole lot of progress?

MS. LAGARDE: On the issue of an accommodative policy by the central banks, certainly what the European Central Bank has done in the last few months has been critical in order to restore confidence, clearly creating a shift in investors' expectations as far as the euro and the Euro Zone is concerned. There are no longer questions about the viability of either the euro or the Euro Zone. What we also noted is that there is some leeway, some room if you will, because of the weak economic outlook and subdued underlying inflation, and the interest rate in the Euro Zone is also clearly higher than in many other regions, including the U.S., the U.K. or Japan, and there is a system that is now in place but that has not been operated if you will, the OMT, which as a tool expands massively the toolbox of the European Central Bank but may have to be put to use at some stage. But I would regard the changes that have taken place in the last six months as fundamental and instrumental in restoring confidence in the zone.

On the sort of gap between declared intention, in other words, reform the governance, implement the doubling of the quotas under the 2010 reform and the quota formula review and the quota review on the one hand, and on the other hand the difficulty in closing that gap, reaching agreement, coming to terms with the difficulty of defining criteria, aligning with the economic changes, is going to be hard work. It's going to be a process that will hopefully take us to the end of 2013 with results. I note that having in parallel the quota formula review and the quota review should by all accounts help in reaching closure of this gap.

QUESTION: Madame Lagarde -- let me ask it this way. The IMF is putting together a new framework for capital controls. As I understand it, under exceptional circumstances or under some circumstance some type of capital controls could be acceptable in the future. Would you say that there is an understanding in this between developed nations and developing nations that enlists developing nations to do their stimulus when it's necessary -- what we have on inflows –

MS. LAGARDE: First of all, what I saw in this meeting was not currency war. There were currency worries, no doubt about it and they were debated, they were discussed, there was a good dialogue on the part of everyone. What does the IMF do in relation to those exchange rate and currency issues? As you mentioned, we have done a lot of work on capital flows. Capital flows come and go depending on many factors and there are quite a few drivers of this come-and-go movement of capital flows. We have slightly amended our guidelines to account for a combination of macroeconomic policies and potential macroprudential rules in case of excess or abuse of capital flow movement . That's one thing that we're doing. We will be developing (operational) guidelines in the course of this year to really update and develop this new position that we have taken and which has been approved by the Board of the IMF.

The second thing that we do is this External Sector Report that actually compares and balances in many ways the various currencies around the world -- that takes into account both the currency rates and the current account balances and determines whether there is enough consistency and fair value if you will, which is work that we have developed in 2012 on a pilot basis and that we will develop yet again in 2013.

Our job is to identify excesses and abuses that can take the form of bubbles, that can take the form of excessive volatility, and frankly we are not seeing that at the moment, but it is something that we need to be attentive to, that we need to be alerted on and that is clearly based on cooperation. Again as opposed to division, we have seen cooperation on the occasion of this G-20, and this is very directly reflected in the communique language. I'm not going to expand forever about it. I think I have been quite explicit on this no currency war, currency worries, no division, cooperation, discipline and the IMF having to do its job on the capital flows review and guidelines and on the External Sector Report, which reviews the equilibrium if you will in the fair value of currencies.

QUESTION: If I may follow-up and let me put it this way. The IMF new guidelines about bringing about this equilibrium contributed -- so you didn't see the currency wars in this meeting?

MS. LAGARDE: Zero currency war. Okay? That's very simple. I have to say it again and I'll be happy to repeat it as often as necessary. The capital flows work that we've done over the last 12 months, which you will happily find on the IMF website, actually is leading to practical work in the form of (operational) guidelines. We will clearly do that. In the same fashion we will continue developing our external sector report and we will include the concept of volatility in our study and in our work.

QUESTION: The IMF quota report. That's what my question -- I wonder if you foresee any changes in SDR -- changes requires in connection with the IMF quota report? And if yes, what changes might be applied in that respect?

MS. LAGARDE: There are two things. One is the reform of the quota formula on which the (IMF) Executive Board has issued its report, its review report if you will, on time, submitted it to the IMFC, and now more work needs to be done because it does not deliver in and of itself a new formula. It delivers the building blocks and more work needs to be done. As a result of that there will be quota moves, if you will. I mentioned the quota review because the quota review might very well entail an increase in the quota, which would help in the process of reallocating among the various countries to reflect the changes of the global economy. As far as the Special Drawing Rights are concerned, I think that's a separate issue. The basket of currencies, the way they're defined, this is a matter that has not been discussed in the course of this G-20 and that is not sort of top of the agenda at the moment. Last question.

QUESTION: -- specifically mention the situation in Japan, isn't the G-20 kind of inviting the yen to fall –

MS. LAGARDE: There is one thing that has been discussed, it's not talking up, talking down, but talking together and there has been very much that determined, creative and disciplined approach among the G-20 members. I will give it like that because I think that's highly respectable. Thank you.


0 Comments :

Post a Comment :: Click!!

コメントを投稿

 ■Sponsored Link

韓国大統領 月山明博(李明博)の…天皇陛下への「不敬発言」
痛惜の念などという単語一つを言いに来るのなら、来る必要はない。
日王は韓国民に心から土下座したいのなら来い。
重罪人にするように手足を縛って頭を足で踏んで地面に擦り付けて謝らせてやる。
重罪人が土下座もしない、言葉で謝るだけならふざけた話だ。
そんな馬鹿な話は通用しない。
それなら入国は許さないぞ。
偽左翼マスメディアの情報操作手法
手法 用例 手法 用例 手法 用例 手法 用例
連想の創出 愛国者に対して「軍靴の音が聞こえそうだ」などと揶揄し否定的な印象を与える… コメント 人々を一定の方向に誘導するために「事実とは異なる解釈」をコメントさせたり「社説」にする… プレゼンス効果 現場からの中継や縮小ジオラマなどで「臨場感」を演出し「やらせ」も交えて信用されやすくする… 分類表 一部の「ネット右翼」が批判しています…のように決まった単語・フレーズで事象を分類して極小化・極大化する…
撹乱 「第三極も含めて政党が乱立して訳が分かりません…」などと連日「情報ノイズ」で溢れさせ興味自体を失わせる… 癒着提案 TBS「安倍官房長官印象操作映像事件」のように「個別の事実」を「継ぎ接ぎ」して「誤った印象」を植え付ける… 匿名の権威 「信頼すべき消息筋によれば…」のように情報元を明かす必要がない事を逆手に取り記事の内容に権威を与える… 日常会話 お隣の「韓国」では…のように本来否定的な要素「韓国」を日常会話のように繰り返し心理的習熟効果で反応を麻痺させる…
感情共鳴 コンサートで開催場所の地名を大声で繰り返し叫ぶ…などのように「デモ」「集会」などで群集を理性ではなく感情レベルで反応させる… 歴史の書き換え 民主党の「天皇制廃止」「戸籍法廃止」「夫婦別姓」などの愛国心を低下させるための国家・民族全体に対する長期的な情報操作… 感情整列 この時間にご覧になっている貴方だけに限定100セットだけ…などと「一定のシチュエーション」を用意して群集の感情を「均一化」させる… 一次効果 「朝日新聞の従軍慰安婦捏造問題」「iPS細胞での読売新聞大誤報」など「最初に発信された情報」は嘘でも捏造でも信用されやすいという原理…
ブーメラン 坂本龍一・山本太郎などの著名人を使い原発管制報道に対する「自由の闘士」を作り出し国力を削るために「愛国者」を装った抗議運動を展開する… 心理的ショック 日本は豊かなのだと錯覚させ更に絞り取るために「飢餓」を伝え…日本は悪い事をしたと日本人を自虐的に思い込ませるために繰り返し「戦争」を伝えます… 半真実 「マニュフェストが実現出来なかったのは自民党の負の遺産のせいで民主党がダメだった訳ではない…」のように嘘の中に一面的な真実を織り込み全体を真実に見せる… フィードバック 「支持政党無しの無党派層は過去最高」という結果を得るために世論調査の回答項目に「民主党もダメだけど自民党もダメ」という項目を設定し全体の意見に偽装する…
すり替え 「傷害」を「いじめ」「窃盗」を「万引き」「殺人事件」を「交通事故」「テロリスト」を「レジスタンス」「略奪事件」を「抗議デモ」など受け入れ易い言葉に置き換える婉曲手法… 脅威の創出 尖閣購入時に「中国の脅威」は民主党政権以降に尖鋭化していたにもかかわらず恰も「都知事発言以降に尖鋭化した」かの如く捏造し民主党には他に選択肢は無かったと責任転嫁… 社会的同意 首相の靖国参拝に「外国」から激しい反発が起こっている…などと…特定アジアだけの意見を恰も世界全体が同意していると錯覚させる…「人権擁護法案」「外国人参政権」などもこの手法… 側面迂回 民主党の原発事故対応では線量などの周辺情報は正確に報じられ枝野幸男の「直ちに健康に影響を及ぼすものではない…」の嘘の信憑性を高めメルトダウン・風向きなどの核心部分は隠蔽された…
虚偽類似 「視聴率低迷は若者のテレビ離れのせい…」「CDが売れないのは違法ダウンロードのせい…」「紅白歌合戦に韓流スターが出演できないのは日本の右傾化のせい…」など都合の良い「原因と結果の因果関係」を作り出す… 事実確認 原発安全神話を作り出したのも公共事業にジャブジャブ税金をつぎ込んだのも自民党です…など…「一面的な事実」を先に述べ「事実確認」させ…自民党政権に逆もどりして良いんですか?…と未来を誤認・錯覚させる… 毒入りサンドウィッチ 「白川総裁が自民党の経済政策を批判」「安倍総裁の経済政策発言を市場が好感し円安に振れ株価は年初来の高値」「一方でハイパーインフレを懸念する声も」…のように序文と結論の否定的報道で肯定的な報道を挟み肯定的な報道の意義を低下させる… 砂糖入りサンドウィッチ 毒入りサンドウィッチの逆の手法…
  偽左翼マスメディアの情報操作手法
偽左翼マスメディアが日本人には絶対に伝えない真実
■イラクでの自衛隊に対する前代未聞の「感謝デモ」
(サムネイル画像のクリックで動画がポップアップ)

当時自衛隊叩きに躍起になってたメディアの
捏造・隠蔽から目覚めよう
誇りある日本の再生のために
「jQuery」と「jQuery UI」で HTML に彩りを添えよう…

「導入」「Button」「Accordion」「Tabs」「Effects/Slide」
「Progressbar」「Dialog」「Tooltip」「Menu」 「Extra」 / 公式「Widgets」以外の「jQuery UI」スクリプト
Blogger Template Customize Universal / INDEX
Blogger テンプレート・カスタマイズ / 全般を解説
高速化・最適化対策の結果と備忘録
Scroll Top